Transcripts that never leave
Session recordings are transcribed and summarised by a model on the same infrastructure that stores them. No third party ever receives the audio or the text.
Plenty of AI projects stop at a policy that forbids sending records to a third party. An open weight model running on your own hardware removes the question rather than arguing with it.
Private LLM fine-tuning adjusts the weights of an open weight model using your own material, then runs the result on infrastructure you control. Because the model sits inside your network or your own cloud account, records reach it without leaving your boundary. The tuning is what makes it fluent in your vocabulary, and the hosting is what makes it private.
A hosted endpoint is the right answer for most work and it is genuinely hard to beat. It stops being available the moment somebody decides the records cannot go to a third party. That decision is usually correct and it ends the conversation, unless the model can come to the data instead.
Some material is not ours to send anywhere. Retention settings do not change that. The objection is to the transfer itself.
Industry terms and internal shorthand come back wrong. Prompting patches it up, then stops helping.
Per token pricing is cheap while volume is low. It keeps growing, and a server that costs the same every month starts looking sensible.
Most of the work is turning your material into examples. Quality decides the outcome far more than size.
Llama and Mistral are the usual families. Weights adjust to your material, rather than a prompt sitting in front of it describing it.
The result runs in your own cloud account. Nothing calls out, because there is nothing to call.
Two days on the constraint and the material. Often a hosted endpoint is the honest recommendation.
The plan prices the hardware, the tuning and the upkeep against what you spend now. You decide whether the move pays.
The dataset gets built first. It decides everything after it. The tuned model is measured against the hosted one.
Most work should rent. This is the comparison for the work that cannot.
| Measure | A hosted endpoint | Your own model |
|---|---|---|
| Where records go | To a third party, retention off | Nowhere. There is no outbound call |
| What it costs | Per token, rising with use | The hardware, flat once running |
| Your vocabulary | Described in a long prompt | Learned by the weights |
| Output you can rely on | Prompted, and checked | Trained toward, and still checked |
| Who keeps it running | The provider does | Somebody has to, and that is a cost |
Three situations where a hosted endpoint is not available. Each ends with the model inside the boundary.
Session recordings are transcribed and summarised by a model on the same infrastructure that stores them. No third party ever receives the audio or the text.
A tuned model returns the shape your ledger expects without a long prompt describing it each time. Output still gets validated in code, because trained toward is not the same as guaranteed.
Posts are checked against your own rules, by a model running on your own servers. What members write never leaves the platform.
Private deployment is a trade. Both sides are worth stating. It buys a boundary. It costs capability and upkeep.
Open weight models, and infrastructure you already know. Nothing here is a requirement, and the work goes ahead against whatever hardware you have.
Every quote here is a real Trustpilot review. We did choose which ones to show you. The score beside them is the part we do not control, and it counts all 29 reviews.
These reviews are for Appkodes, our software product division.
A Joysale client on the product and the service
He runs a marketplace built on Joysale, our Letgo style product. The clip is his own account of working with us.
A Fantacy client on the build
Fantacy is our Amazon style retail product. He goes through what was built and how the work ran.
An Airfinch client, filmed after his written review
Airfinch is our Airbnb style rentals product. He had already left the same review on GoodFirms before recording this.
A second Joysale client on the same product
Another marketplace running on Joysale. Worth watching beside the first, since the two bought the same thing.
I've worked with Appkodes for 7 years on 4 different projects. We constantly require support or the implementation of new features, and we have the guarantee that the quality of their work remains the same throughout this time.

Appkodes exceeded all of our expectations! From the very first contact, the team demonstrated a high level of professionalism, technical expertise, and commitment to quality.

Appkodes team helped me to launch my healthcare application very quickly. Their software was very close to my requirements and adding some extra features made my project easy.

I so much love your services and I will continue to patronize your company.

I worked with AppKodes for a website and mobile app development project, and overall, I'm very satisfied with the results. Their team was responsive and flexible throughout the process, and they delivered a product that met my expectations both in design and functionality.

It was a good experience working with the team. They understood my ideas clearly and built everything as expected. The team was supportive, quick to respond, and helped me whenever I needed changes. Thank you for your hard work and support!

I have got a mobile app project going on successfully with the team. Their Support is good. turn around time for any requirement is great. Every detail of my app is meticulously designed. THANK YOU APPKODES.
Appkodes is a leader in developing high-quality applications and websites. It was a pleasure working with them, and this certainly won’t be our last collaboration. My experience was exceptional, they developed an outstanding app and website, with smooth and refined interactions.
Overall very good experience. I have been availing services for past 3 years. They are available for discussions and resolving issues whenever we faced any. Mr. Saravana has been looking after our project and I'm very much happy with his timely response. I would definetely recommend.

Initially, I was hesitant to deal with them, believing their customer service would be poor. However, I was surprised. They act with great responsibility and professional efficiency. My regards to them.

You have been supporting me very quickly in every matter, especially in the last 2 months, and this makes me very happy.

Very professional. Our project was quite complex and they covered all the aspects. Appkodes did an amazing and professional job developing and creating our Apple and Android apps. I was positively impressed with the communication you can absolutely trust on what they say.

Mani and Saravanan of the Appkodes team are amazing, they have done the best to create and support my project! I give them 10/10 stars for their efforts and work!

It was really great, they are there for me whenever I had a problem or to fix something. Thank you so much Ameer

I've been working with Appkodes for almost a year and i can recommend them to work with as they are so much friendly and professional and you can clearly see it once you start your project right away. They are intact and they are transparent with their communication.

I have to be honest, sometimes it's hard to find a company or someone abroad to do your project. Not only might you waste your time and money, there is this thing called trust. In business you must trust the person you are dealing with.

Businesses we have built for












Less than people expect. A quantised model gives up some quality for a large drop in what it needs to run. A great many jobs are served well by that trade. The sizing gets costed in week two.
Usually the Llama or Mistral families, picked for what the job needs rather than for what is newest. Model families are named here deliberately and versions are not, because whichever is current when you read this will not be current for long.
The training itself is the short part. Preparing a dataset worth training on is where the time goes, and it depends entirely on what state your material is in. Week one exists to answer that first.
Not always, and trying the prompt first is cheaper. Tuning earns its place when prompting has plateaued, or when the prompt has grown long enough to cost real money on every call.
Somebody keeps it running. Hardware, updates and monitoring do not vanish just because the model now belongs to you. That upkeep is a real cost. We do it after handover unless you would rather not.
No, and the difference is the point. Retention off means a promise not to keep it. Hosting it yourself means nothing is sent, so there is no promise to rely on and nothing to audit.
Data entry, answering the same tickets, chasing numbers between systems. We automate the parts that repeat. Your team keeps the parts that need judgement.

