Serial numbers off a box
Electronics arrive with long serials and codes that get mistyped. A phone camera reads them off the packaging, and the row lands in the database with nobody keying it.
Overstock and stockouts are the same mistake pointing in opposite directions, and both come from counting by hand and guessing at the rest. An MVP tests the forecasting on part of your catalogue.
A smart inventory AI MVP is a working stock tool built narrow enough to trial on part of a catalogue. A vision model reads what arrives, so a delivery is counted in from a photograph rather than typed. Forecasting then runs against your own sales history, which is what makes a restock alert worth acting on rather than another dashboard nobody opens.
Stock decisions get made from numbers that were accurate at the last count and have drifted since. Between counts the buying happens on memory. The cost lands twice, in capital tied up in dead lines and in sales lost on the ones that moved.
A cycle count is accurate on the day it happens. Every day after that, the system and the shelf move further apart from each other.
Whoever knows which lines move is going on experience. That knowledge leaves the building at five o'clock.
Capital sitting in slow lines does not announce itself. It surfaces at valuation, long after the money went.
A vision model pulls codes and quantities off the packaging. Somebody photographs the delivery, and the count goes in from there without anybody keying it.
Forecasting runs on how fast a line actually sells against how long a supplier takes. The alert arrives with enough time to act on it.
Holding costs and falling value get tracked while stock sits. Capital stuck in slow lines stops being a surprise.
Two days in the stockroom rather than in a meeting. Counting, receiving and reordering all get watched as they happen.
The plan names the lines to trial and the cost. You decide whether it goes ahead.
The MVP goes live beside your existing system. Nothing is switched off yet.
One replaces how the business runs. The other answers whether the forecasting is worth having.
| Measure | A full ERP | An inventory MVP |
|---|---|---|
| What it changes | How the whole business operates | One product line, beside what you run |
| Getting stock in | Typed, or scanned with bought hardware | Photographed on a phone |
| Deciding a reorder | A reorder point somebody set once | A rate that is recalculated as it sells |
| What you commit | Licences and a rollout across the company | One catalogue slice you can stop |
| If it does not suit you | You are already migrated onto it | You switch it off and keep the finding |
Three jobs a stockroom already does badly by hand. Each is narrow enough to trial on its own.
Electronics arrive with long serials and codes that get mistyped. A phone camera reads them off the packaging, and the row lands in the database with nobody keying it.
The engine watches selling rate against supplier lead time. When those cross it drafts the order.
Holding cost and falling value are tracked per line. The dashboard shows where capital is stuck while there is still time to move it.
This is deliberately not a system replacement. It is the smallest thing that shows whether AI forecasting is worth having in your stockroom.
Ordinary components in a small configuration. Nothing here is a requirement, and the work goes ahead against whatever your stock system was built on.
Every quote here is a real Trustpilot review. We did choose which ones to show you. The score beside them is the part we do not control, and it counts all 29 reviews.
These reviews are for Appkodes, our software product division.
A Joysale client on the product and the service
He runs a marketplace built on Joysale, our Letgo style product. The clip is his own account of working with us.
A Fantacy client on the build
Fantacy is our Amazon style retail product. He goes through what was built and how the work ran.
An Airfinch client, filmed after his written review
Airfinch is our Airbnb style rentals product. He had already left the same review on GoodFirms before recording this.
A second Joysale client on the same product
Another marketplace running on Joysale. Worth watching beside the first, since the two bought the same thing.
I've worked with Appkodes for 7 years on 4 different projects. We constantly require support or the implementation of new features, and we have the guarantee that the quality of their work remains the same throughout this time.

Appkodes exceeded all of our expectations! From the very first contact, the team demonstrated a high level of professionalism, technical expertise, and commitment to quality.

Appkodes team helped me to launch my healthcare application very quickly. Their software was very close to my requirements and adding some extra features made my project easy.

I so much love your services and I will continue to patronize your company.

I worked with AppKodes for a website and mobile app development project, and overall, I'm very satisfied with the results. Their team was responsive and flexible throughout the process, and they delivered a product that met my expectations both in design and functionality.

It was a good experience working with the team. They understood my ideas clearly and built everything as expected. The team was supportive, quick to respond, and helped me whenever I needed changes. Thank you for your hard work and support!

I have got a mobile app project going on successfully with the team. Their Support is good. turn around time for any requirement is great. Every detail of my app is meticulously designed. THANK YOU APPKODES.
Appkodes is a leader in developing high-quality applications and websites. It was a pleasure working with them, and this certainly won’t be our last collaboration. My experience was exceptional, they developed an outstanding app and website, with smooth and refined interactions.
Overall very good experience. I have been availing services for past 3 years. They are available for discussions and resolving issues whenever we faced any. Mr. Saravana has been looking after our project and I'm very much happy with his timely response. I would definetely recommend.

Initially, I was hesitant to deal with them, believing their customer service would be poor. However, I was surprised. They act with great responsibility and professional efficiency. My regards to them.

You have been supporting me very quickly in every matter, especially in the last 2 months, and this makes me very happy.

Very professional. Our project was quite complex and they covered all the aspects. Appkodes did an amazing and professional job developing and creating our Apple and Android apps. I was positively impressed with the communication you can absolutely trust on what they say.

Mani and Saravanan of the Appkodes team are amazing, they have done the best to create and support my project! I give them 10/10 stars for their efforts and work!

It was really great, they are there for me whenever I had a problem or to fix something. Thank you so much Ameer

I've been working with Appkodes for almost a year and i can recommend them to work with as they are so much friendly and professional and you can clearly see it once you start your project right away. They are intact and they are transparent with their communication.

I have to be honest, sometimes it's hard to find a company or someone abroad to do your project. Not only might you waste your time and money, there is this thing called trust. In business you must trust the person you are dealing with.

Businesses we have built for












The MVP reads sales from your POS through its API. That covers the common hosted tills and it covers something built for you years ago. Where there is no API we look at what it can export before proposing anything.
Not for a trial. A phone camera and a vision model read codes off a box well enough to prove whether the approach works. Dedicated scanners are faster at volume, and that is a decision worth making after the MVP rather than before it.
The forecasting logic and the API wrappers are written to production standard from the outset. You widen the catalogue and add features. The dashboard is the part most likely to be rebuilt, and it is the cheapest part to redo.
It answers one question, which is whether forecasting on your own data beats the way you buy now. It is deliberately not a replacement system. It runs beside what you have. That is what makes the comparison honest.
It works better on a slow catalogue than people expect, because lead times matter more than volume. What it needs is history rather than scale. A year of sales on a few hundred lines is usually enough to test the idea.
For a trial, yes, because the scope is one slice rather than the whole company. That is the wrong comparison though. The MVP tells you whether the forecasting earns its keep, and then buying or building is a decision with evidence behind it.
Data entry, answering the same tickets, chasing numbers between systems. We automate the parts that repeat. Your team keeps the parts that need judgement.

